🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.