🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."